Dhruv Gupta

Principal Investigator, Zetesis Labs (ARTPARK @ IISc) · Innovator-in-Residence

Bengaluru, India

Building verified, long-horizon synthetic discovery: measurement, causal world-models, and formal verification kernels composed into systems that stay correct as conditions change.

I want to change the world to match an image in my mind, a world where discovery is faster, more reliable, and less hostage to luck.
Dhruv Gupta
Bengaluru, 2026
01 · Engineered discovery
Inquiry is treated as a controllable operator. Unknowns are typed, explicit, testable.
02 · Measurement before models
Trustworthy traces are the substrate of trustworthy inference. Most "AI failures" are calibration failures in disguise.
03 · Verification at stake
Systems must audit their own uncertainty. The output surface is tethered to evidence, not narrative fluency.

Education & Awards

Education, awards, invited talks, teaching, and references. Full CV (PDF).

Education
B.S. (Research), Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore (2021–2025). First Class with Distinction, CGPA 8.8/10.
Thesis (A+, Rank 1): Measuring What Models Miss.
Lab training
S. P. Arun (visual neuroscience, IISc) · clinical neurology internships, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Delhi (2022, 2023) · MSOT neuro-endocrine imaging under Prof. Sanhita Sinharay, IISc (2023) · neuro-optics under Alistair Lewis (postdoc), Arjun Yodh lab, U Penn (2022, hybrid).
Awards
iGEM 2022 Gold Medal (Paris Jamboree), Best Climate-Crisis nomination · KVPY Fellow (AIR 50) · JEE Main 99.94th percentile · Abhiprajna (AIR 1) · All-India Subject Topper (Biology) · CBSE X & XII 98.7% / 97.6% (100% in Math, Science, Computer Science).
Invited talks
Sponsored panelist, Prosthetics & Robotics 2026, Boston, representing IISc · invited lectures at IIT Delhi and AIIMS Delhi.
Teaching & workshops
  • A Textbook of Formal Learning Theory · self-authored open-access monograph (202 pp, 18 chapters, 142-node concept graph).   PDF · source.
  • Neuromorphic Computing at IISc IEEE (120 participants, 3 days, March 2024); Neural Networks → Circuits → DNA at the All-India iGEM Meet (60 participants, 16 institutions, July 2024); GNNs for Breast-Cancer Drug Discovery at IIT Delhi (35 h, 26 M.Tech./PhD, October 2024); embedded C / RTOS / Cortex-M crash course via IISc Robotics Club (Jan–May 2023); The Mathematics of Change, a 6-hour workshop at a college fest qualifier, organised by EduTech (50+ participants, experts included), on climate as a control system with epistemic limits.

Magnetic Fields in the Heavens, a problem set written for a national physics competition organised at IISc, walking students from coffee-pot convection to stellar dynamos (open challenge: tackle it, and if you get it right we'll be very good friends).

Industrial leadership
Board Member, ARTPARK Industry 5.0 programme (2025–).
References
Prof. Bharadwaj Amrutur, Dept. of Electrical Communication Engineering, IISc Bangalore (career mentor; sponsor of JRD-Tata ISC, ARCNet, IiR charter) · Prof. Sumanta Bagchi, Centre for Ecological Sciences, IISc (undergraduate thesis advisor, Terrapulse) · Prof. S. P. Arun, Centre for Neuroscience, IISc (TCN instructor, neuroscience collaborator) · Prof. Dipankar Nandi, Dept. of Biochemistry, IISc Bangalore (Essentials in Immunology course instructor; course-based recommender) · Dr. Ishaan Gupta, PI, Fungel Lab (Functional Genomics), Dept. of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, IIT Delhi · Gopika Kannan, ex-VP Cognitive Solutions & Innovation, MassMutual · Vish Ranganathan, Gigafactory & Autonomous Robotics / Physical AI Leader, Panasonic Energy of North America · Narayan Rangarajan, Head of Agile R&D, Ather Energy · Dr. Sudip Mondal, Head of Hardware, Firmware, and Systems Engineering, Ather Energy.
IISc Convocation 2025, Undergraduate Programme
IISc Convocation 2025.
SGRH neurology rotation, scrub attire
SGRH neurology rotation, Delhi.

Open Source

Personal and Zetesis research code, live from @Zetetic-Dhruv. ARCNet client deployments (Satsure, School of Meaningful Experiences, Open Science Stack) are listed with their clients in Studying Discovery While Doing It.

12 public repos
1 followers
@Zetetic-Dhruv

@Zetetic-Dhruv: I want to understand discovery. In my research, it is deeply interconnected with propositions over structured ignorance.

Repositories

formal-learning-theory-kernel

@Zetetic-Dhruv · updated Apr 2026

Lean4 kernel for synthetic formalization and discovery of statistical learning theory. First and complete formalization of the 5 way fundamental theorem. Typed premise + human-guided, AI-driven proof search across PAC, online, and Gold paradigms. The infrastructure forced by the types produced original mathematics.

Zetetic-Dhruv

@Zetetic-Dhruv · updated Apr 2026

Dhruv Gupta — Principal Investigator, Zetesis Labs @ ARTPARK IISc

zetesis-puremath

@Zetetic-Dhruv · updated Apr 2026

Shared Mathlib-adjacent pure mathematics staged from Zetesis formalization projects. WIP.

transformer-learning-theory

@Zetetic-Dhruv · updated Apr 2026

Lean4 measurability-theoretic foundations for transformer architectures. Attention routing universality, compositional measurability, NullMeasurable necessity. Builds on formal-learning-theory-kernel.

formal-learning-theory-discovery

@Zetetic-Dhruv · updated Apr 2026

Synthetic math discovery analysis: 74 URS traces, metakernel data, and empirical analysis of 10,000+ exploration paths in formal learning theory

formal-learning-theory-dataset

@Zetetic-Dhruv · updated Mar 2026

Structured JSON dataset for formal learning theory + fine-tuned SLM specialized in learning theory formalization

First-Proof-Benchmark-Results

@Zetetic-Dhruv · updated Mar 2026

Empirical analysis of synthetic discovery of non trivial math proofs using frontier models

formal-learning-theory-book

@Zetetic-Dhruv · updated Mar 2026

A Textbook of Formal Learning Theory (202pp, 18 chapters) + structured JSON concept graph (142 nodes, 260 edges)

Contribution Activity (last year)

Loading contribution graphs…

Public GitHub REST API · cached locally for 30 minutes · contribution graphs rendered via ghchart.rshah.org.


The Programme (2025–Present)

At Zetesis Labs I run one research programme across seven fields, asking whether discovery can be engineered rather than left to chance. Current work separates into three layers, each with concrete artifacts: a formal verification kernel written in Lean4; a synthetic-discovery stack (LLM harness → compile-filter pipelines → verified outputs); and industrial and biomedical pilots that test each piece against reality. The programme's deployed outputs are Layer-2 (root-cause analysis, calibration, compliance, reliability planning), not philosophy as user interface.

Institutional pattern: I have founded or led Zetesis Labs, ARCNet Research, and the JRD Tata Innovation Support Center at IISc, and sit on the ARTPARK Industry 5.0 programme board alongside BEL, Bosch, and Toyota. Each of those exists to make a specific piece of the discovery stack reachable in practice.

What follows is what each layer looks like as a working instance.


Selected Work

Active pilots and released artifacts, organised by layer. Projects tagged Synthetic Discovery are long-horizon research projects generated and maintained using AI.

Applied Pilots · Industrial & Biomedical

Ather Energy

Ather Energy · Robotic welding reliability (K383)

Causal root-cause analysis under drift. Deployed, 2025.

Problem. Intermittent welding anomalies on a production line produced high MTTR because the linkage between alarm, defect, and action was weak and ad-hoc.

Approach. A causal world-model for the welding cell aligned to the 4Ms: Man (operator context), Machine (telemetry/configs), Method (process recipes), Material (batch provenance). Implemented as an OWL ontology, internally named K383.

2,586Nodes
7,934Directed edges
~30 daysModel build time
60 / 12 / 28%Resolvable / evidence-gated / structurally unresolvable

Uncertainty diagnostic. A geometric belief-function analysis (Cuzzolin framework) classifies each failure path by resolvability: 60% are diagnosable from error codes alone, 12% require targeted additional evidence, and 28% are structurally unresolvable without live data integration. The diagnostic tells the operator not just what happened, but what else needs to be known.

Output. Ranked suspects, fault-path narrative, and minimum next checks that collapse uncertainty fastest. Drift is treated as first-class; verification gates keep explanations tethered to evidence rather than LLM fluency.

Temple wearable — cerebral-blood-flow sensor (Continue Research / Eternal)

Temple · Sensor validation & causal calibration

Speckle plethysmography feasibility; phantom-first. Engagement with Continue Research (Eternal).

Three workstreams. (1) A stable SPG reference system with primary flow/perfusion metrics; (2) a reproducible multi-layer phantom with controlled confounders; (3) a calibration mapping with QC gates.

Thesis. Calibration is where sensing programmes quietly fail. Making confounders and interventions first-class (rather than nuisance) makes calibration transferable rather than artisanal.

Terrapulse · Research-grade soil CO2 flux

Open-source instrument · IISc B.S. Research thesis (A+, Rank 1) · code: github.com/ARC-Net / CO2mmunity

Low-cost NDIR CO2 cell (K33-ELG) on embedded compute, designed to capture sub-minute flux pulses at research-grade precision. Three-layer Bayesian calibration chain: FTIR step-test → lab pulse simulation → multi-day field mass-closure via alkali trap. Field-deployed in Lahaul–Spiti valley over 2024–25.

~$150Bill of materials
±2 ppmPrecision
3.8%Flux MAE (mass-closure)
sub-minPulse capture

Open methods, datasets, and analysis pipeline released at ARC-Net / CO2mmunity. Final 95% posteriors: gain = 0.993 ± 0.005; offset = 16 ± 10 ppm; drift = 0.002 ± 0.020 ppm h−1.

Current iteration is a miniaturised, solar-powered revision of the same sensing chain, designed for unattended multi-month deployments in remote terrain.

Terrapulse instrument, top view
Instrument, top view.
Gasmet FTIR and Terrapulse wired in a closed loop in the lab
Gasmet FTIR + Terrapulse, closed-loop cross-calibration in lab.
Terrapulse Mini: miniaturised solar-powered revision (render, angle 1)
Terrapulse Mini · solar-powered revision (render).
Terrapulse Mini (render, angle 2)
Mini enclosure · alternate angle.

iGEM · Halocleen · Pseudomonas putida for halocarbon biodegradation

IISc iGEM 2022 project, Paris Jamboree Gold Medal, Climate-track finalist. Two bioreactor designs with patents pending.

Problem. CFC-11 and CFC-12 persist in the stratosphere for decades with no scalable biological degradation path. The project asked whether an engineered soil bacterium could be coaxed into degrading halocarbons at rates relevant to atmospheric removal.

Approach. Engineered Pseudomonas putida as the chassis, carrying synthetic circuits assembled from plasmids drawn from the methanotroph halocarbon-oxidation literature. Two bioreactor designs (continuous-flow trickle-bed and gas-lift variants) were optimised for the low-solubility substrate regime; patents filed, pending.

Team Lead, 2022. ~10-person team (bio, hardware, modelling, wet-lab validation). Covered in the IISc press release: IISc students win again at iGEM.

Halocleen bioreactor head plate under assembly
Bioreactor head-plate during assembly.
IISc iGEM 2022 team at the Grand Jamboree in Paris
iGEM 2022 Grand Jamboree, Paris.

Formal Kernels · Lean4

Formal Learning Theory Kernel Synthetic Discovery

21,728 lines of Lean4, machine-checked with no gaps.

A self-contained Lean4 kernel of formal learning theory, currently under arXiv review and being upstreamed to Lean4 cslib and mathlib. Four results it carries that the field had been citing rather than proving:

  • Borel–analytic separation theorem: weakens the Borel-measurability hypothesis of Krapp–Wirth 2024 to analytic / null-measurable, with a strict separation witness (a concept class whose bad event is null-measurable but not Borel). Closure under patching, interpolation, and amalgamation. All main results formalised in Lean4.
  • Constructive MWU-based compression proof.
  • PAC-Bayes bound: first Lean4 formalization of record.
  • Choquet capacitability: previously absent from Mathlib4.

Formalization is the claim, checked by the Lean4 compiler.

The fundamental theorem, stated and proved in the kernel as a single term (FLT_Proofs/Theorem/PAC.lean):

/-- Fundamental theorem of statistical learning (5-way equivalence, BP₅). -/
theorem fundamental_theorem (X : Type u) [MeasurableSpace X]
    [MeasurableSingletonClass X]
    (C : ConceptClass X Bool) [MeasurableConceptClass X C] :
    (PACLearnable X C  VCDim X C < ) 
    ((VCDim X C < ) 
       (k : ) (cs : CompressionSchemeWithInfo0 X Bool C), cs.size = k) 
    ((VCDim X C < ) 
       ε > 0,  m₀,  (D : MeasureTheory.Measure X),
        MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure D 
         m  m₀, RademacherComplexity X C D m < ε) 
    (PACLearnable X C 
       (L : BatchLearner X Bool) (mf :     ),
        -- PAC guarantee, sample-complexity upper bound, and matching lower bound
        ...) 
    ((VCDim X C < ) 
       (d : ),  (m : ), d  m 
        GrowthFunction X C m 
           i  Finset.range (d + 1), Nat.choose m i) :=
  -- BP₅: 5-way conjunction assembles from component theorems
  vc_characterization X C,
   fundamental_vc_compression X C,
   (vc_characterization X C).symm.trans (fundamental_rademacher X C),
   pac_sample_complexity_sandwich X C,
   vcdim_finite_imp_growth_bounded X C,
    growth_bounded_imp_vcdim_finite X C⟩⟩

PAC-learnability ↔ finite VC dim ↔ bounded compression scheme ↔ vanishing Rademacher complexity ↔ polynomial growth function. Sauer–Shelah, symmetrisation, and concentration inequalities are the three loadbearing lemmas.

Transformer Learning Theory

Measurability-theoretic foundations for attention architectures.

Lean4 results: attention-routing measurability; softmax–argmax equivalence under appropriate limits; a universality statement (every measurable router is attention); and a NullMeasurable necessity result.

Spekkens 2007 · Hidden Capacity Synthetic Discovery

31 machine-checked theorems extending Spekkens's epistemic toy-theory of quantum states.

A Lean4 formalization of Spekkens's 2007 epistemic toy-theory of quantum states, together with HC(κ): the first continuous measure of interpolation failure in epistemic theories of mechanics. HC = 0 iff the theory's admissible configurations are rectangular (decomposable).

Boundary results. The four entangled states admit HC = 2.00 bits; the three separable states admit HC = 0. Only private-evidence conditioning collapses nonzero HC; shared evidence resolves 0% of it. A cross-domain oscillation theorem the Lean4 kernel checks by construction. Three predictions beyond Spekkens follow as corollaries and are verified in the kernel.

LLM harness · First Proof Challenge Synthetic Discovery

Operational pipeline; Harvard benchmark, commodity compute.

An LLM-driven proof search harness that reached 4 of 10 on Harvard's First Proof Challenge benchmark using $32 of commodity API compute on a single MacBook. The number is not the point. The shape of the failures is. Where the harness succeeds is where formalization gates exist; where it fails is where they are absent.

Neuroscience Modeling

Hyper-Resonant Dendritic Oscillations (HDO)

Single-neuron timing primitive · preprint on request.

Claim. A single stellate cell carries two stable intrinsic oscillatory regimes (a θ-like slow regime and a high-frequency HDO regime) with stochastic switching driven by channel noise.

Mechanism. Stochastic CaV gating (Gillespie) plus a calcium-activated current plus BCM-like intrinsic plasticity regulates the transition probability between regimes. Bifurcation reasoning points to a subcritical Hopf / SNIC candidate; robustness confirmed under parameter sweeps.

Consequence. A timing primitive that is neither a fixed oscillator nor a pure integrator. The metaplasticity-gated switching between regimes is itself the computation.

Origin: a final-project artifact of Prof. SP Arun's Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience course at IISc.

Dawn Arbor Synthetic Discovery

Open Python platform for machine-checked neurobiophysics.

Converts ModelDB .hoc models into a type-inheritance DAG so neurobiophysics models can be composed, type-checked, and verified like programs rather than passed around as opaque simulation scripts.

NIAS collaboration · Neurochaos learning for calibration

With the National Institute of Advanced Studies, IISc campus.

Using neurochaos-learning primitives (chaotic-attractor features) as a calibration substrate for biosensors where conventional linear calibration is brittle to nonstationary confounders.


Studying Discovery While Doing It

Each of the programmes below was run as a nested experiment: a social and research test of what makes discovery faster, more reliable, and less accidental at a given scale. The order is ascending: founder / student-club to team, team to chapter, chapter to programme, programme to research institute.

Virog MedTech

Founder · IISc-funded student medtech club. ~5 people. Institutional grant pool of ₹10 L.

What was tested. Whether a five-person student team, with an institutional grant pool but no commercial pressure, could deliver three independent medtech devices from first principles on pre-clinical timelines.

Devices. OECT wound bandage; UV-SSI patch for HAI prevention; physics-driven CVD predictor.

Highlight. The CVD predictor won 1st prize at IIC 2025 (IISc Innovation Challenge).

The club is now inactive; the three devices and the mentorship chains came out of it, and the structure of the experiment is what we kept.

Origin (most naive version of the work): Virog · MIT Solve submission.

Virog product strategy whiteboard, 2023: VADE, UV4, TTE, Virog Clinics
Product-line whiteboard, 2023. VADE · UV4 · TTE · Web Services · Virog Clinics. Prototype cost target: $1.

IISc Robotics Club

Founder & President, 2023–. ~30 members. ₹5 L club budget.

What was tested. Whether parallel multi-domain student robotics projects can run concurrently under a shared budget without losing depth. Active lines under the club: lunar rover, rehab exoskeleton, drone, 6-DoF manipulator, legged-locomotion prototypes.

Team Vicharaka · University Rover Challenge. Out of the club, the Mars-rover team Vicharaka ("one who thinks") qualified for the University Rover Challenge (URC) at the Mars Desert Research Station, Utah. I led the Life-Detection subsystem: biosignature-sampling and onboard assay for the Martian-soil analogue, pipelined to the rover's onboard compute. Coverage by IISc's Connect IISc: “Red Rover”.

Prof. Pradipta Biswas's lab team · ISRO IRoC-U 2024 finalist. A separate rover team, based in Prof. Biswas's group at the Nahar Centre for Robotics · Robert Bosch Centre for Cyber-Physical Systems, IISc. The team was a finalist in the ISRO Robotics Challenge (IRoC-U 2024) run by URSC, securing a ₹25 L grant. I was the undergraduate team member contributing the biology half of the lunar-surface assay stack.

Hexapod walking robot built in the IISc Robotics Club
Club prototype: 18-servo hexapod.
Biswas lab ISRO IRoC-U 2024 team structure diagram
Biswas lab IRoC-U team · click to enlarge.

IEEE Computer Society / CIS Student Chapter, IISc

Chair.

What was tested. Whether the chapter could broker a concrete undergraduate-to-graduate research-exposure loop at low institutional friction, alongside running an open curriculum under the IEEE brand.

“Hire an Undergrad” programme. The main operational artifact of my term. MTech and PhD students could post short project briefs on the chapter board and, with their supervising professor's approval, “hire” an undergraduate as a research assistant for a scoped piece of the project. Undergrads got first-contact research exposure on active problems (not make-work); grad students got a documented assistant pool without rewriting bureaucracy. The matching itself was lightweight: a one-page brief, a faculty sign-off line, a handshake.

Other outputs. Open-source 6G lecture series.

IEEE Computer Society / CIS Student Chapter, IISc: chapter event with faculty
IEEE CS/CIS Student Chapter, IISc · event with faculty advisors.

EntIISc · IISc Entrepreneurship Cell

Vice-President. 44 deep-tech proposals screened. Brokered ₹15 L seed pool (FSID).

What was tested. Whether a campus cell, working inside the IISc incubation structure, could route deep-tech student proposals to institutional funding at scale. Output: 44 screened proposals, Boeing sponsorship, and a working pathway to the FSID institutional grant pool.

External validation. EntIISc won first place at E-merge, the inter-institution entrepreneurship-cell competition run by IIT Hyderabad's E-Cell. I pitched on behalf of the cell and served on the event's panel alongside other cell leads and invited speakers.

Cell overview: About EntIISc.

Dhruv Gupta pitching for EntIISc at E-merge, IIT Hyderabad
Pitching for EntIISc at E-merge · IIT Hyderabad.

JRD Tata Innovation Support Center · IISc

Founder-Director · PI, 2024. 40+ students. 8 project tracks.

What was tested. Can the same operator catch the center-of-mass unknown in eight unrelated domains within a single summer? All 8 tracks reached working prototype; the portfolio itself is the contribution.

  • Voice-first teleoperation of a robotic arm from smartphone (safety + latency trade-off).
  • Digital-twin-driven bionic arm with calibration drift as the primary failure mode.
  • Low-cost servo + encoder stack (FSM decoding of noisy inputs).
  • BCI/EEG → text with generative-AI coherence gates.
  • Physics-to-math knowledge engine (compiler as verification gate).
  • General-purpose multi-I/O power converter.
  • Fuel-quality automation with Pass/Fail/Inconclusive as a first-class output.
  • Forensic triage with Bayesian uncertainty and mandatory justification chains.

Also prototyped SoTA instrumentation for the Karnataka Forensics Lab.

JRD Tata ISC inaugural session, 5 May 2024
Inaugural session, 5 May 2024.
Briefing the JRD summer cohort at IISc
Briefing the 40+-student cohort.
JRD Tata Innovation Support Center team at ARTPARK, IISc
Summer team at ARTPARK.

ARCNet Research · R&D foundry at ARTPARK @ IISc

Founder & PI, 2024–Jun 2025. 18-member institutionally- funded lab at ARTPARK. Transitioned to permanent team.

What was tested. Whether an institutionally-funded deep-tech foundry can deliver unrelated research engagements end-to-end, each on its own scientific terms. Four independent engagements below.

Kaleideo (by Satsure)
Satsure · KALIDEO
Remote-sensing QC · classical + deep-learning

Dockerized pipeline testing classical and deep-learning approaches for cloud segmentation on satellite hardware. Optimized for on-device inference under bandwidth and power constraints.

School of Meaningful Experiences
School of Meaningful Experiences
Multimodal evaluation · full-stack deployment · 5 microservices

Automated grading of interviews, presentations, and speech, with LMS integration. Audio capture, video capture, grading pipeline, LLM feedback, and report generation run as independent microservices so each can be scaled, swapped, or audited without touching the others.

Open Science Stack
Open Science Stack · Science Compiler
Autonomous science · robotic-lab orchestration · ontology-driven protocol synthesis

OSS is a volunteer-driven, non-profit digital public infrastructure for AI-powered, self-driving labs, backed by ARTPARK (IISc) and the Red Black Trust. Its architectural thesis: treat experiments as cloud-dispatchable programs (“write once, run anywhere”) across a network of programmable physical labs. The Science Compiler is my contribution: a three-layer behaviour-tree architecture for robotic laboratories that compiles high-level scientific intent into robot-agnostic execution via ontology-driven protocol synthesis. It slots into OSS's inner experiment-optimization loop and feeds the ROS2-based Robotic Application Stack (RAS).

Indian Institute of Science
LeanAide · Prof. Siddhartha Gadgil (IISc)
Lean4 assistant for natural-language math

ARCNet contributed to LeanAide, a Lean4 assistant for natural-language mathematics, at Prof. Siddhartha Gadgil's lab at IISc. It tackles autoformalization (natural-language math into machine-checkable Lean4), one of the least-developed bridges between LLMs and formal verification.

CO2mmunity project team (ARCNet engagement) at ARTPARK, IISc
CO2mmunity project team · ARCNet engagement at ARTPARK, IISc.
OSS team on stage at ROSCon India
OSS on stage at ROSCon India.

Zetesis Labs · ARTPARK Industry 5.0 Board

Principal Investigator · Innovator-in-Residence · Board Member, 2025–Present.

What is being tested. Whether a sustained research programme can close the loop from formal epistemology to industrial deployment across multiple partners. Active: manufacturing R&D automation pilots with BEL, Bosch, and Toyota.


Course Projects

Cool projects from coursework.

Creative Engineering Design · Classroom Chair

PD 203, Prof. Amaresh Chakrabarti, CPDM / IISc, 2024. Group project.

A classroom chair with a steering tripod (so it can be lifted and wheeled for easy cleaning) and a floor-pedal coupled to a dynamo that trickle-charges a phone once the rider is pedaling stably. The problem we chose to solve was classroom sleepiness, a very real pandemic.

Chair project team at the fabrication workshop
Team at the fabrication workshop.
The finished chair: pedal-dynamo + clipboard + steering tripod
The finished chair · pedal, dynamo, clipboard, tripod.

Neuromorphic Analog VLSI Design · Binary Encoder Bit Correction

E0 204, Prof. Chetan Singh Thakur, DESE / NeuRonICS Lab, IISc.

Final project: bit-correction in a binary encoder via a neuromorphic construct. Alongside, during the course: a neuromorphic mod of SPICE, built as a local substitute because Cadence access was gated to department MTech and PhD students only.

Information–energy efficiency operator

MB 208 Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience, Prof. SP Arun, IISc.

A complex-valued operator that expresses the energy–information tradeoff in neural computation, studied in Brian2 simulations of a two-cell post-inhibitory rebound oscillator.

-- Complex efficiency phasor
Λ = |Λ| · e^(jθ)    

-- Phase-lag taxonomy
 θ-band              Regime              Functional role
 ────────────────   ──────────────────  ─────────────────────────────
    θ < 30°      reactive            immediate transduction
 30°  θ < 45°      memory-forming      partial integration
 θ  45°            memory onset        past input dominates
 60°  θ < 75°      planner/anticipatory predictive buffering
 θ  75°            generative planner  information allocates energy

Partial validation. Baseline and temperature-drift Λ posteriors recovered in Experiments 1–2; the MPMOSS falsification sweep (Experiment 3) was not completed. Mixed results; the taxonomy is a design proposal, not a validated claim.


More Projects

Expand (9 projects)
Clientless research

Artificial Neuroscientist

Clientless research · ARCNet-funded, same model as Terrapulse.

Closed-loop spike-sorting and video-based behavioural grading wired to an automated hypothesis → proof pipeline. Studies what a minimum-viable neuroscience pipeline looks like when human-in-the-loop is optional and the protocol is ontology-driven.

Applied & biomedical (secondary)

Cerebral Blood Flow · SPG wearable (with Continue Research)

Physics world-model → novel sensing → cross-modal transfer.

A cerebral-blood-flow physics world-model feeding an SPG-based wearable sensor; brain phantoms for controlled validation; and a transfer-learning bridge from SPG to PPG so the physics stays tethered to the sensor that survives reality.

Deterministic hemodynamics via radiometric inference

Physics-first pipeline for cuffless hemodynamics: stiffness discrimination under controlled perturbations, treated as an inverse problem against a tractable forward model rather than a regression on raw PPG.

Multigas sensor suite · CO2 / N2O / CH4

Sibling programme to Terrapulse extending low-cost field chemistry to three greenhouse gases. KOH / V2+-HCl / KI colourimetric chemistries paired with NDIR and catalytic readouts; LoD < 10 ppb across species.

Siemens knee-resection robot

6-DoF surgical manipulator with a physics- accurate digital twin driving pre-cut trajectory planning; ±0.2 mm bone-cut fidelity at proof-of-concept. Shared platform for kinematic verification experiments.

Formal theory (secondary)

ICM Unbundling

Lean4 formalisation of OOD geometry for factored knowledge-graph embeddings.

Seven theorems proving that independent causal mechanisms make distribution shift geometrically visible, with VC-dimension bounds, a risk decomposition, and an entanglement-vulnerability converse. The converse does the work: entanglement is a vulnerability, not a feature.

FLT dataset + fine-tuned SLM

Structured JSON dataset for formal learning theory paired with a fine-tuned small language model specialised in FLT formalisation. Built to close the gap between high-effort human proofs and machine-assisted formalisation. Repo: formal-learning-theory-dataset.

Synthetic discovery (secondary)

Knowledge-creation engine (JRD) Synthetic Discovery

Generate-and-verify pipeline for physics problems.

Compile/filter workflow producing 500+ labelled mechanics problems with verified solutions. A concrete test of whether synthetic problem generation can cross the quality threshold required for training data. The answer was yes, when verification is load-bearing.

BCI/EEG → text with generative-AI post-editing (JRD)

Neural signal decoding with coherence-checked synthesis.

Decoding pipeline from low-density EEG to natural-language text, with synthetic data augmentation and a coherence-checked LLM post-edit stage. Exploratory decoding metrics; the useful result was the post-edit gate: without it, fluent hallucination dominates.

Neuroscience (secondary)

Contact

The most useful opening is a paragraph describing the problem, the constraints, and what solved would look like. I read everything directly.

Write to [email protected], or to my IISc address [email protected] for academic correspondence.

Timelines: 48 hours for serious inquiries; longer for cold outreach without specifics.

The Research Programme: Zetema

Discovery as inquiry over structured ignorance.

Knowledge is what remains after inquiry. Ignorance is not a residual error term; it has internal geometry. If you can represent that geometry, you can engineer discovery.

The conventional view treats ignorance as noise, a residual to be minimized by more data or better models. That view predicts monotonic progress with compute. What we observe instead is that the hardest problems keep the same shape as compute grows: more of the same model on more of the same data converges to a better version of the same failure.

Zetema's reversal is the starting move. If ignorance has internal structure, progress depends on acting on that structure, not dissolving it. The rest of this page shows what the programme has produced. This section describes the framework that produced it. It is not decoration; it is the operating manual for every artifact above. The sections below are intentionally sparser than the work above; each is load-bearing, and none are duplicated.

Hover a node to read its definition.

Calculus of Discovery

Internally I represent a local theory-state as a compact object URS = ⟨A, M, R, T⟩: axioms, mechanisms, representations, traces. Inquiry is a small set of primitive operators that modify this object. Each corresponds to a concrete capability of a deployed system.

Imagine (abd)

Propose new variables or mechanisms. Migrate unarticulated regularities into explicit questions. This is where grammar grows.

Quadrant transition: UK → KU.

Experiment (do)

Design minimum interventions that collapse uncertainty cheapest. The cost function is real, not metaphorical.

Quadrant transition: KU → KK.

Describe (rep)

Retype traces into stable representations. Keep language consistent with what data can actually carry.

Quadrant transition: stabilize KK against drift.

Communicate (com)

Import external knowledge as traces or representations, not axioms. Other people's certainty does not become yours automatically.

Quadrant transition: URSi ↔ URSj, via shared traces.

Measurement classes

A single "confidence" number is a projection; like any projection, it drops information. Zetema tracks four orthogonal measurements instead. They do not aggregate: a claim can be high-Pl and low-Coh (admissible, but doesn't compose), or high-Comp and low-Inv (everything is resolved inside a frame that dies under perturbation). The four are the minimum set that doesn't lose structure.

Class Operational question
Plausibility (Pl) Could this claim be consistent with current structure? Is it admissible at all?
Coherence (Coh) Does the claim compose with other admitted content, or does it fracture?
Invariance (Inv) Does it survive perturbations of the current frame, i.e. coherent future challenges, not just repeated trials?
Completeness (Comp) What fraction of the obligations the claim induces are actually discharged?
Efficiency of validated novelty:  η = ΔKvalidated ∕ (E × Iprior)

Low η typically signals missing causality, missing abstraction, or missing intervention design rather than low effort; it reads as a diagnostic of where the work is missing.

Cognitive architecture: learning vs imagination

Two agents with the same traces can diverge because they factor the world differently. That factoring is a property of the agent, not the data. Zetema names two distinct faculties rather than compressing them into "intelligence":

Learning

Supplies bedrock content. Tends to constrain you to what is repeatedly experienced and safely generalized. Learning admits constraints.

Imagination

Posits a structure cheaply from thin traces, then acts to make it real through tools, experiments, and world-shaping. Imagination expands agency.

A serious system keeps ignorance explicit while still allowing fast synthesis. Learning without imagination is corrigible but timid; imagination without learning is bold and wrong. Modern LLMs, absent verification gates, are the second case made concrete: fluent imagination with no admitted constraint. The measurement classes above tell you when the second case has occurred.

Formal verification as infrastructure

Formalism here is not decoration. It is the substrate that makes reasoning systems converge, makes ignorance explicit, and keeps explanations tethered to what can be justified. Without it, the previous three sections reduce to vocabulary: a nice way to talk about what discovery should feel like, with nothing checking whether the talk matches the system.

Lean4 is the working language for three specific reasons. First, proof terms are first-class evidence: a Lean proof is the object it certifies, not a citation to one. Second, the type system makes ignorance explicit: every hypothesis, every assumption, every hole appears as a type obligation that cannot hide. Third, decidable type-checking with explicit universe management scales: the 21,728-line FLT kernel stays sound because no part of it relies on a human's mental model of what should have been proved.

The programme trades on this directly: every output that leaves a Zetesis system can carry a checkable receipt. A partner does not have to trust the reasoning; they can verify it.

Current tools: Lean4 / type theory / structured knowledge graphs. Research direction: a geometric lens on model behaviour (including LLMs) where homogeneity, impurities, and phase transitions in generalization are treated as objects rather than side effects.

Everything above the divider is evidence. Everything below it is the grammar that generated it. If the grammar is load-bearing, the evidence ought to feel inevitable in retrospect: each pilot, each kernel, each programme slotting into a place the framework had already named. That is the claim, and the rest of the page is how we are checking it.